Why Tenant Screening Is High-Stakes in Ontario

In Ontario, the tenant selection process is regulated by the Human Rights Code, administered by the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (HRTO). A prospective tenant who believes they were denied housing for a discriminatory reason can file an application with the HRTO — and unlike the LTB, the HRTO has broad remedial powers including monetary compensation and orders to change your practices.

HRTO complaints are not rare, and they don't require the applicant to prove you intended to discriminate. If your selection process had a discriminatory effect — even if unintentional — you may be required to justify your decision. If you can't, the complaint can succeed.

Important: You do not need to be malicious or even wrong to face an HRTO complaint. A legitimate rejection can still result in a complaint. The key is having a documented, non-discriminatory basis for every decision you make. This article explains how.

The 17 Protected Grounds Under the Human Rights Code

The Ontario Human Rights Code prohibits discrimination in housing on the following grounds. Any question, practice, or criterion that screens tenants based on these characteristics — directly or indirectly — is potentially discriminatory.

Protected Ground Examples Relevant to Housing
Race, colour, ancestry, ethnic origin Name-based screening, requirements tied to country of origin
Citizenship Requiring Canadian citizenship or permanent residency
Place of origin Questions about where an applicant was born or raised
Creed (religion) Refusing applicants based on religious observance or holidays
Sex, gender identity, gender expression Differential treatment based on gender
Sexual orientation Questions or criteria tied to relationship structure
Marital status Refusing unmarried couples, singles, or divorced applicants
Family status Refusing applicants with children — one of the most common complaints in residential housing
Disability Refusing applicants who use mobility aids, have mental health conditions, or require accommodation
Age (18+) Excluding applicants because they are young adults or seniors
Receipt of public assistance Refusing applicants on ODSP, OW, or other government income support — this is a prohibited ground in housing under Ontario's Code
Record of offences Blanket refusals based on a criminal record (subject to exceptions)

"Receipt of public assistance" in Ontario: This is one of the most misunderstood protected grounds. In Ontario, refusing a tenant specifically because their income comes from ODSP, Ontario Works, or another government assistance program is discrimination. You can require that income be sufficient to cover rent — but you cannot refuse based on its source alone.

What You Can Legally Ask

Despite the protected grounds, you have significant latitude to screen applicants on financial and rental history criteria. Here's what's permitted:

What You Cannot Ask

These questions are either prohibited outright or create significant HRTO risk. Avoid them entirely — even informally, in conversation:

Credit Checks: How to Do Them Right

Running a credit check on a prospective tenant is legal and standard practice in Ontario. The requirements:

  1. Written consent is required. You must obtain the applicant's signed consent before pulling their credit report. Your rental application form should include a credit check consent section.
  2. Use an approved credit reporting agency. Equifax and TransUnion are the standard options. Some landlords use tenant-screening services that bundle credit, background, and income verification.
  3. Evaluate consistently. If you use credit score as a criterion, apply the same threshold to all applicants for that unit. Inconsistent application of criteria is how neutral-seeming practices become discriminatory in practice.
  4. A low credit score alone is not automatically disqualifying. If the score is low due to circumstances that could be tied to a protected ground (e.g., a disability that caused income disruption), you need to be careful. A poor score combined with excellent references and stable current income presents a different picture than a poor score with a history of payment defaults.

Income Verification: The Legal Approach

You can ask applicants to demonstrate that their income is sufficient to afford your unit. What you cannot do is discriminate based on the source of that income.

Acceptable verification methods:

You can require that total income meet a threshold (e.g., gross income at least 2.5–3x monthly rent). You cannot require that the income come from employment specifically, or that it exclude government sources.

References: What to Ask and What to Document

Prior landlord references are valuable and legal. When contacting a prior landlord, stick to rental history questions:

Do not ask questions designed to surface protected characteristics, and do not act on information a reference volunteers that relates to a protected ground. If a reference tells you an applicant "has a lot of health issues" — that's information you should not consider in your decision, and you should note that you did not consider it.

Documenting Your Decision

Your decision documentation is your protection if an HRTO complaint is filed. For every rental unit, keep a file that includes:

The core principle: If you can explain every selection decision in terms of legitimate, consistently-applied financial and rental history criteria — and you have documentation to support it — your screening process is defensible. The HRTO complaint risk isn't eliminated, but you're in a strong position to respond to one.

Free: HRTO Tenant Screening Kit

Includes an HRTO-compliant rental application form, approved screening criteria framework, reference check script, and decision log template. Free download, no credit card required.

Download Free →

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Ontario human rights law is regularly updated and interpreted through HRTO decisions. For specific situations, consult a licensed paralegal or lawyer familiar with Ontario human rights and residential tenancy law.